Epstein jail guards used ‘fake body’ to trick media waiting outside the prison while paedophile’s ‘real corpse’ was loaded into van unnoticed, files claim

0

Jail guards overseeing Jeffrey Epstein used a decoy body to mislead reporters gathered outside the prison after his death, while his real corpse was secretly removed in a separate vehicle, newly unsealed files claim.

According to an internal memo, a jail supervisor told FBI agents that staff at Manhattan’s Metropolitan Correctional Center staged the ruse amid an intense media presence following Epstein’s apparent suicide in 2019.

The files allege that boxes and sheets were arranged to resemble a human body and loaded into a white van marked as belonging to the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner, prompting reporters to follow it as it drove away.

Unbeknown to the media, Epstein’s actual body was instead placed into a black vehicle that left the facility ‘unnoticed,’ allowing officers to transport the corpse privately.

The alleged deception was carried out after an official warned guards about the large number of journalists gathered outside the jail and said he would arrive at the loading dock with a separate black vehicle to remove the body.

The records also reveal investigators highlighted a handwritten note found inside Epstein’s cell at the time of his death, which was not treated as a suicide note by the medical examiner.

The note, which investigators said was ‘difficult to read’, appeared to list grievances about jail conditions, including complaints about food, showers and bugs.

But even the “real corpse” wasn’t real.

Here are the most commonly cited alleged differences, along with explanations based on available reports and analyses:

  • Nose shape and structure — Some side-by-side comparisons claim the nose on the corpse appears different (e.g., wider, flatter, or differently proportioned) than in living photos of Epstein. This is typically attributed to post-mortem changes, such as tissue relaxation, swelling from trauma or resuscitation efforts, gravity-dependent settling of fluids, or simply low-resolution/angled photography distorting features. No forensic analysis has confirmed a structural mismatch beyond normal variation.
  • Ear shape and positioning — A frequent point of focus is that the ears on the body (especially visible in gurney photos) look differently shaped or attached than in earlier living images. Critics highlight supposed discrepancies in earlobe size, cartilage contour, or how the ear sits relative to the head. Explanations include angle of the head on the stretcher (often tilted or turned), post-mortem sagging of cartilage and skin, lighting/shadows, and the fact that many comparisons use photos taken years apart (e.g., a 15-year-old living photo vs. a fresh corpse). Aging, weight changes, and photographic distortion also play roles.
  • Overall facial appearance and skin tone — The body on the gurney is sometimes described as looking “too pink” or lifelike for a dead person, with even coloring across the face. In reality, pallor mortis (paleness after death) sets in gradually over hours, and livor mortis (blood pooling) depends on position and time since death. Epstein was discovered relatively soon after the event and received CPR/resuscitation attempts, which can maintain some coloration temporarily. Moisture under the nose (sometimes mistaken for “purge fluid”) has also been cited but is explainable by medical intervention or normal post-mortem effects.
  • Other minor claims (e.g., missing tattoo on arm, facial proportions) — Some posts allege a tattoo or mark visible in older living photos is absent on the body. These are usually based on poor image quality, arm positioning/obscuring in photos, or simple misidentification. Official reports, including fingerprint matching noted during investigations, confirmed the body’s identity as Epstein.

Pictures of Epstein after he supposedly died do not comport to reality: